Richard Telford’s Blog
@richardjtelford
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
- A demo targets plan for reproducible pipelines for Neotoma data
- Reproducibility of high resolution reconstruction – one year on
- Simplistic and Dangerous Models
- COVID-19, climate and the plague of preprints
- Erroneous information … was given
- Making a pollen diagram from Neotoma
- Count sums – the preprint
Archives
Categories
Tags
- analogue quality
- autocorrelation
- Baffin Island
- Barycentre
- Benthic foraminifera
- Bob Irvine
- Bulafu et al (2013)
- calibration-in-time
- China
- chironomids
- chrysophytes
- climate models
- critical transition
- data archiving
- diatoms
- Dietl (2016)
- dinocysts
- Doug Keenan
- EDA
- graphics
- Guiot and de Vernal (2011)
- h-block cross-validation
- Heartland
- impact
- INTIMATE training school
- Kelsey et al 2015
- Klein et al (2013)
- Klemm et al 2013
- lake level
- Lake Silvaplana
- Larocque-Tobler et al (2010)
- Larocque-Tobler et al (2011)
- Larocque-Tobler et al (2012)
- Larocque-Tobler et al (2015)
- LGM
- Liu et al 2014
- Lyons et al 2016
- maps
- Marcott et al 2013
- Mauri et al (2015)
- Miller et al 2013
- moss
- Murry Salby
- neotoma
- NIPCC
- Norway
- ocean acidification
- ordination
- palaeoSig
- Peer review
- Planktonic foraminifera
- Poland
- pollen
- R
- radiocarbon calibration
- radiocarbon dating
- Reconstruction diagnostics
- reconstructions
- REDFIT
- Schulz & Mudelsee (2002)
- Sea ice
- sea ice reconstruction
- Skjærvø et al (2015)
- spatial autocorrelation
- Spectral analysis
- Tatra Mountains
- Telford (2006)
- Telford and Birks (2011)
- Testate amoeba
- Transfer function diagnostics
- Uganda
- uneven sampling
- Willie Soon
- Younger Dryas
- Zhang et al 2017
Blogroll
Follow me on Twitter
My TweetsMeta
- Follow Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology on WordPress.com
Category Archives: reproducible research
A demo targets plan for reproducible pipelines for Neotoma data
In any analysis, there are a series of steps: data importing, cleaning, analysis, creating figures, and then putting it all together in an manuscript. Very often, some of these steps are time consuming, and you don’t want to rerun everything … Continue reading
Reproducibility of high resolution reconstruction – one year on
It is about a year since my paper discussing the reproducibility of high resolution reconstructions was finally published, so I thought I should give a full account of what has happened since. Nothing. None of the authors of the papers … Continue reading
Posted in Peer reviewed literature, reproducible research, transfer function
Tagged chironomids
Leave a comment
Making a pollen diagram from Neotoma
Last week I gave a course on R for palaeoecologists covering data handling using tidyverse, reproducibility and some some ordinations and transfer functions. One of the exercises was to download some pollen data from Neotoma and make a pollen diagram. … Continue reading
Tools for a reproducible manuscript
It is all too easy to make a mistake putting a manuscript together: mistranscribe a number, forget to rerun some analyses after the data are revised, or simply bodge the round some numbers. Fortunately it is possible to avoid these … Continue reading
Insist() on the text and numbers agree in Rmarkdown
The manuscript I submitted a long time ago contains multiple sentences where I describe the result with both text and numbers. For example: With a three-year moving average, the correlation is weak (r = 0.21) and not statistically significant (p … Continue reading
Citing R and packages automatically
Almost every manuscript I write has a paragraph that looks something like this: All analyses were done in R version 3.4.4 (R Core Team 2017). Ordinations were fitted with vegan version 2.4-6 (Oksanen et al. 2017) with square-root transformed assemblage … Continue reading
