Richard Telford’s Blog
@richardjtelford
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
- Resampling Assemblage Counts
- A demo targets plan for reproducible pipelines for Neotoma data
- Reproducibility of high resolution reconstruction – one year on
- Simplistic and Dangerous Models
- COVID-19, climate and the plague of preprints
- Erroneous information … was given
- Making a pollen diagram from Neotoma
Archives
Categories
Tags
- analogue quality
- autocorrelation
- Baffin Island
- Barycentre
- Benthic foraminifera
- Bob Irvine
- Bulafu et al (2013)
- calibration-in-time
- China
- chironomids
- chrysophytes
- climate models
- critical transition
- data archiving
- diatoms
- Dietl (2016)
- dinocysts
- Doug Keenan
- EDA
- graphics
- Guiot and de Vernal (2011)
- h-block cross-validation
- Heartland
- impact
- INTIMATE training school
- Kelsey et al 2015
- Klein et al (2013)
- Klemm et al 2013
- lake level
- Lake Silvaplana
- Larocque-Tobler et al (2010)
- Larocque-Tobler et al (2011)
- Larocque-Tobler et al (2012)
- Larocque-Tobler et al (2015)
- LGM
- Liu et al 2014
- Lyons et al 2016
- maps
- Marcott et al 2013
- Mauri et al (2015)
- Miller et al 2013
- moss
- Murry Salby
- neotoma
- NIPCC
- Norway
- ocean acidification
- ordination
- palaeoSig
- Peer review
- Planktonic foraminifera
- Poland
- pollen
- R
- radiocarbon calibration
- radiocarbon dating
- Reconstruction diagnostics
- reconstructions
- REDFIT
- Schulz & Mudelsee (2002)
- Sea ice
- sea ice reconstruction
- Skjærvø et al (2015)
- spatial autocorrelation
- Spectral analysis
- Tatra Mountains
- Telford (2006)
- Telford and Birks (2011)
- Testate amoeba
- Transfer function diagnostics
- Uganda
- uneven sampling
- Willie Soon
- Younger Dryas
- Zhang et al 2017
Blogroll
Follow me on Twitter
My TweetsMeta
- Follow Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology on WordPress.com
Tag Archives: Peer review
The peer review of Ollila (2016)
Climate skeptics occasionally publish papers in journals featured on Beall’s list of predatory journals. Various blogs will then proclaim the new addition to the peer-reviewed literature. And so it is with Ollila (2016), featured today on WUWT. Since these papers … Continue reading
2015: The year in reviews
Reviewing is part of an academic’s workload, part of our service to the community. I think it tends to make papers better, even if only by finding out which aspects of a manuscript might confuse someone who is reading too … Continue reading
Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology 